By Peter SiegenthalerTHIS CONTENT WAS PUBLISHED ON JUNE 19, 2017 11:00 AMJUN 19, 2017 - 11:00
Even a Swiss-brand watch will not run forever. Nowadays, minor repairs can be very expensive or take months because many specialist watchmakers no longer receive spare parts from Swiss manufacturers.
If your Mercedes breaks down anywhere in the world, you don’t need to send it to the factory in Stuttgart. You can confidently take it to an authorised dealer in your area.
But what is common practice in the car industry no longer works for some Swiss-brand watches: the specialist shop in Shanghai, Brussels or Zurich where you bought your Breitling, Omega or Cartier can no longer repair your luxury chronometer themselves. It's due to a breakdown in a once-cooperative relationship between manufacturers and retailers.
“The retail trade is being excluded from repairs,” complains the owner of an established Bernese watch retailer, who wants to remain anonymous. “Certain brand manufacturers no longer supply spare parts but require that the watches be sent to the brand workshop, even for minor repairs.”
Why is Switzerland so dominant in this sector? How many Swiss watchmakers are there? Is Rolex the best known brand?
By Samuel Jaberg & Duc-Quang Nguyen
The victims are first and foremost the customers, who now have to fork over CHF500 or more, he says. In the brand workshop, not only is the broken crown replaced but a general check-up of the whole watch is also carried out. And instead of a few days, customers sometimes have to wait for months for their expensive timepiece.
The Bern-based watchmaker is not alone in his criticism. Donato Trivisano, managing director of Mundwiler jewellers in Winterthur, gives the example of Richemont, manufacturer of Cartier, Jaeger-LeCoultre, IWC and Baume & Mercier brands, which wants to do everything itself.
“Even certified specialist shops whose trained watchmakers regularly attend multi-day training courses by the brand manufacturer are excluded.”
The latest example is the company Breitling, which has recently taken over all repairs – even though Mundwiler is the only recognised Breitling “service centre” around.
Trivisano also knows of customers who had to pay up to CHF1,000 for simple repairs and wait months for their watches because the manufacturer carried out a full overhaul without the owner’s consent.
He says he has heard from several customers who will no longer buy Breitling timepieces.
Breitling, which was taken over by British financial firm CVC Capital Partners in April, did not want to comment on the accusations by the specialist watchmakers.
“Unfortunately we cannot help you further,” CVC head of communications, Carsten Huwendiek, told swissinfo.ch.
On its website, the Grenchen-based watch company tells its customers: “By respecting the service intervals recommended by Breitling and by ensuring that servicing is done by an authorised service centre, you will extend the lifespan of your watch.”
Jean-Daniel Pasche from the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry says in response to the criticism by the specialist watchmakers: “I know that the brand manufacturers actually pursue a selective distribution of spare parts. Normally, they deliver these only to the retailers who are part of their official network.”
When asked about the troubled partnership between certain brands and retailers, Pasche says he isn't familiar with the various brands' policies.
The federation says it has been contacted by individual consumers because of the high costs or duration of repairs. “But these are individual cases, so I can’t derive a general trend from them.”
However, the experiences of the two retailers from Bern and Winterthur are not isolated cases, says André Hirschi.
The president of the Association of Swiss Goldsmiths and Specialist Watchmakers regrets this development. He appreciates that the brand manufacturers want to ensure good quality servicing, too.
However, according to Hirschi, the certified specialist watch repairers can generally provide this service more quickly and more cheaply. The association president fears that this new strategy by certain brand manufacturers could damage the Swiss watch industry's long-term reputation.
“There is no reason to spend a large amount of money on a piece just to be able to tell the time,” he says. “And if the passion for the timepiece becomes a period of suffering, some customers may fall out of love with their treasured possession.”
Switzerland's Competition Commission (COMCO) has also received several complaints from consumers and retailers in recent years, confirms Kenji Izumi of the COMCO secretariat. “We are in the process of making preliminary assessments.”
The secretariat is pursuing “possible unlawful behaviour patterns from an antitrust point of view of various watch manufacturers in after-sales services.”
The results of COMCO's preliminary assessments will be available soon, Izumi said.
end of infobox
Not just in Switzerland
The European Confederation of Watch and Clock Repairers’ Associations filed a complaint against several Swiss luxury watch manufacturers a few years ago because they were no longer supplying spare parts to independent specialist watch repairers. The confederation complained that the manufacturers were abusing their dominant position.
In 2014, however, the European Commission stopped their investigation, saying the distribution system in the watchmaking industry varied hugely between the brands and the chance of proving a violation was limited. The European Commission said it had already spent a huge amount of time on the issue and further investigations would be complex and time-consuming.
end of infobox
Translated from German, swissinfo.ch
Elena ChongCourt Correspondent
SINGAPORE - Together with two conspirators, a man cheated pawnshops of nearly $100,000 earlier this year by pawning them counterfeit timepeices that were passed off as genuine Audermars Piguet watches.
Fong Kheng Yue, 44, then received about $10,000 from his alleged accomplice, who gave him the fake Audemars Piguet watches.
On Tuesday, Fong, who is unemployed, was jailed for 18 months after admitting to three of eight charges of abetment by conspiracy to cheat Heng Seng Pawnshop, Moneymax Pawnshop and Soon Yi Pawnshop between Jan 11 and Feb 1 this year.
The total amount involved in the eight charges is $98,000.
Cases against two others, Lam Chan Pieu, 30, and Chen Zhiwei, 33, are pending.
A district court heard that early this year, Lam allegedly told Fong that he had some counterfeit watches which could be pawned as authentic Audemars Piguet watches.
The watches, kept in boxes, were accompanied by fraudulent certificates of authenticity.
Fong agreed to the plan as it was a "good and quick way to earn money".
As part of the conspiracy, he would keep 10 per cent of the proceeds on the pledge, and deliver the remaining sum to Lam.
As the pawnshops targeted required guarantors, Lam would either stand as the guarantor himself, contact Chen to stand as guarantor or provide Fong with identity cards of individuals to use when pledging the watches.
On Jan 11, Fong deceived Heng Seng Pawnshop Company at Lorong 6 Toa Payoh into believing that the fake watch pledged was an authentic Audemars Piguet, and induced the pawnshop to deliver $13,000 to him.
Two days later, he and Chen entered Moneymax Pawnshop at Tampines Central 1 and conned the shop into delivering $15,000 to Fong.
Fong went to Soon Yi Pawnshop in Woodlands Street 31 on Feb 1 and got away with $14,000 after pledging the fake watch.
Fong, who received about $10,000 for his involvement in the conspiracy, was arrested three days later at Changi Airport, a day after a Valuemax Pawnshop appraiser lodged a police report.
He could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined on each charge.
Copyright © 2019 SwissSAV - All Rights Reserved.